Who Else Has 6.6" Wrists?

Looking to follow some more folks with similarly sized wrists to gain some insight on what fits out there ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป I find that 6.6" sits right on the edge of being able to pull off a Duro, and all but the smallest G-Shocks are a little too large for me.

ยท

What s the Duro diameter?

I'm 6.5 and find 41mm is max that I'm comfortable with, but it may be different if there's a thinning bezel edge then I might look at 42mm.

Zelos

Image
ยท

@jamesbwill2 Maybe James can help ๐Ÿค™๐Ÿฝ

@HaasTone the Duro is 41/42 mm in diameter

ยท
HaasTone

What s the Duro diameter?

I'm 6.5 and find 41mm is max that I'm comfortable with, but it may be different if there's a thinning bezel edge then I might look at 42mm.

Zelos

Image

Nice Zelos!

The Duro is 44mm, but lug to lug is just shy of 50mm. Otherwise, plenty of 44mm watches that I can't pull off!

ยท

I'm at 6.5 inches and the Bulova Lunar Pilot wears comfortably. 53mm lug to lug is probably my limit.

ยท
TimeOnTarget

I'm at 6.5 inches and the Bulova Lunar Pilot wears comfortably. 53mm lug to lug is probably my limit.

Great to know! I still have yet to see a Lunar Pilot in real life and the idea of ordering one has always made me nervous, until now. Thanks!!

ยท

I'm at 6.5 and it fits fine

Image
ยท

I am 6.8 and most bracelets are either just snug or tad bit lose. I love those with micro adjustments.

ยท

Itโ€™s not just the size of your wrist, itโ€™s the shape too. Specs only really tell half the story and are a good indicator, but you never know until you get the watch on your wrist. Donโ€™t dismiss a watch purely on specs.

ยท
JamesTil6569

Itโ€™s not just the size of your wrist, itโ€™s the shape too. Specs only really tell half the story and are a good indicator, but you never know until you get the watch on your wrist. Donโ€™t dismiss a watch purely on specs.

Ah, now that is interesting. This is the first mention of wrist shape that I recall hearing, and now I wonder why it isn't talked about more often!

ยท

Hello ๐Ÿ‘‹

I have a 6.5 inch wrist ๐Ÿ™Œ๐Ÿค.

I love me some Duro!

I look at lug to lug over case size personally.

The Duro is just 48mm L2L, despite having a large 44โ€ case size haha.

One watch I had my eye on was just 42mm butโ€ฆ

50+mm L2L.

I knew it just was going to be big.

Nowโ€ฆmy Invicta 1953 is a 40mm case size.

But, just under 49mm L2L.

Safe to say, staying under 49mm L2L works best IMO.

At the end of the day, buy what you like ๐Ÿค๐Ÿ˜Š.

Image
ยท
jamesbwill2

Hello ๐Ÿ‘‹

I have a 6.5 inch wrist ๐Ÿ™Œ๐Ÿค.

I love me some Duro!

I look at lug to lug over case size personally.

The Duro is just 48mm L2L, despite having a large 44โ€ case size haha.

One watch I had my eye on was just 42mm butโ€ฆ

50+mm L2L.

I knew it just was going to be big.

Nowโ€ฆmy Invicta 1953 is a 40mm case size.

But, just under 49mm L2L.

Safe to say, staying under 49mm L2L works best IMO.

At the end of the day, buy what you like ๐Ÿค๐Ÿ˜Š.

Image

I mainly go by lug to lug too, although the Duro is also on the large size in terms of case size. All personal preference, of course. It's a killer watch either way!

ยท
grandprixfan

Ah, now that is interesting. This is the first mention of wrist shape that I recall hearing, and now I wonder why it isn't talked about more often!

I don't know if @JamesTil6569 was talking about the wrist shape more than the watch shape. James please confirm. I have a 7" wrist which isn't that much bigger that 6.5" - 6.75" and in fact when I'm cutting weight before the summer my wrist may just be under 7". The shape and design of the watch does make a lot of difference - Especially the size, shape of the dial AND bezel/minimal bezel or lack of. Here's a few pictures, the watches with thin / minimal bezels looks and appears larger than the larger spec watches at 41mm - 44mm. All of them are sub 50mm LTL.

So definitely trying it on and seeing it in person makes a huge difference in deciding if the fit works.

40mm

Image

40mm

Image

44mm

Image

44mm

Image

41mm

Image

Cheers ๐Ÿป๐Ÿ‘Š๐Ÿฝ

ยท
Jamair23

I don't know if @JamesTil6569 was talking about the wrist shape more than the watch shape. James please confirm. I have a 7" wrist which isn't that much bigger that 6.5" - 6.75" and in fact when I'm cutting weight before the summer my wrist may just be under 7". The shape and design of the watch does make a lot of difference - Especially the size, shape of the dial AND bezel/minimal bezel or lack of. Here's a few pictures, the watches with thin / minimal bezels looks and appears larger than the larger spec watches at 41mm - 44mm. All of them are sub 50mm LTL.

So definitely trying it on and seeing it in person makes a huge difference in deciding if the fit works.

40mm

Image

40mm

Image

44mm

Image

44mm

Image

41mm

Image

Cheers ๐Ÿป๐Ÿ‘Š๐Ÿฝ

@Jamair23 Both the shape of the watch and the shape of the wrist play a big effect. I was referring to the shape of the wrist.

Broadly speaking, I would say:

The size of the watch will determine if it will generally fit on there. (Basic specs, width, height, lug to lug etc)

The shape of your wrist will determine HOW it fits and more importantly, how comfortable that watch is.

For example, my 6.5inch wrist is obviously not perfectly round, no ones is. But my wrist has a span of 55mm, meaning itโ€™s relatively flat on top. This means I can comfortably wear a watch with a larger lug to lug than other people with a 6.5inch wrist who donโ€™t have as much span, as I have a bit more real estate to play with.

The down side is that the bracelet therefore has to articulate further, as a lot of that 6.5inchs is the flat top of my wrist, the bracelet has to curve around more sharply.

On my SMP300, I have two half links in it. This allows a little bit more articulation due to the very long claps and longer lug to lug of the watch, for it to be comfortable. I literally couldnโ€™t wear it without them as it would be too uncomfortable.

So I think the shape of your wrist is just as important as the specs of the watch.

Hope that makes sense. And hey, itโ€™s just my opinion of course. Oh, and nice collection by the way ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป

ยท
JamesTil6569

@Jamair23 Both the shape of the watch and the shape of the wrist play a big effect. I was referring to the shape of the wrist.

Broadly speaking, I would say:

The size of the watch will determine if it will generally fit on there. (Basic specs, width, height, lug to lug etc)

The shape of your wrist will determine HOW it fits and more importantly, how comfortable that watch is.

For example, my 6.5inch wrist is obviously not perfectly round, no ones is. But my wrist has a span of 55mm, meaning itโ€™s relatively flat on top. This means I can comfortably wear a watch with a larger lug to lug than other people with a 6.5inch wrist who donโ€™t have as much span, as I have a bit more real estate to play with.

The down side is that the bracelet therefore has to articulate further, as a lot of that 6.5inchs is the flat top of my wrist, the bracelet has to curve around more sharply.

On my SMP300, I have two half links in it. This allows a little bit more articulation due to the very long claps and longer lug to lug of the watch, for it to be comfortable. I literally couldnโ€™t wear it without them as it would be too uncomfortable.

So I think the shape of your wrist is just as important as the specs of the watch.

Hope that makes sense. And hey, itโ€™s just my opinion of course. Oh, and nice collection by the way ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป

Wow! That's some intel and awesome details. I too would have never thought or discuss the shape of the wrist. Thank you for the well drafted explanation man ๐Ÿป๐Ÿ‘Š๐Ÿฝ