Design Deepdive: The Air-King, a Non-Chronograph Chronograph

Having just completed my first set of a three-watch collection, I dived back into the Rolex rabbit hole in search of my next timepiece. During my search, I couldn’t unsee the Air-King—and it’s not a compliment. Its busy dial hurt my brain. To relieve the pain, I decided to understand what the designers were trying to achieve, hoping to find anything to justify its existence in the Rolex lineup and potentially in my collection.

After reading about the history of the Air-King line and the latest set of watches, it dawned on me that Rolex was trying to create a “Non-Chronograph Chronograph.” You see, Rolex put a lot of effort into custom-building the chronograph for the Bloodhound car project and wanted to translate it into a watch they could sell, but I don’t think they had the movement that they could mass produce.

Image

Before going any further, we need to understand how the Bloodhound car’s chronograph works because it’s key to understanding the design decision. The chronograph was specifically created to time the one-hour turnaround needed for world record speed attempts, requiring two runs within that hour. If the full exercise runs past an hour, all efforts have been in vain and the record will not be approved. The chronograph resembles a 60-minute timer, where the "minute" hand tracks seconds from 0 to 60, and the "hour" hand indicates the minutes elapsed. The small Explorer-style sub-dial at the 6 o’clock position actually displays the time of day.

I am sure that Rolex doesn’t have the movement required to recreate such a chronograph in a mass-produced watch, so the next best thing they could do was play with the design of the dial. And looking at the final product, I think they did the best they could, and I am quite satisfied.

First of all, you need to trick your mind. Imagine the Air-King without the hour hand. That’s it. That's how Rolex re-creates the Bloodhound Chronograph on a mass-produced watch without having to create a new chronograph movement. Again, this is purely aesthetic, and you can’t use it as a chronograph, obviously.

Image

But what about the sub-dial? You can’t sell a watch that doesn’t tell time. In this case, ignore the second hand and the minute indices. Here you go:

Image

Both the 116900 (v1.0) and 126900 (v2.0) of the Air-King have their pluses and minuses, but I’d choose the 116900 because it’s easier to play these tricks in my mind if the 3/6/9 hour indices are in a different color from the minute indices. Moreover, the 5-minute mark does not have zero, which is how it's supposed to be.

Image

If the current iteration sells well, I think Rolex will have a surprise for us when they release v3.0 of the Air-King. If I had to speculate, I’d guess they might make the Air-King a real chronograph with a center dial movement similar to the Mido Multi-Centerchrono watches.

Image

Another design direction they could take is to make the Air-King a less blingy Sky-Dweller and without the day, date, and GMT complications.

Image

References:

·

I wore my v1.0 like a GADA for a couple of years in 2016/7 and it took some punishment yet still accurate today. The Milgauss case gave it oomph for work and play.

·

Great insightful post, top man.

·

I will come to the current design's defence and say that it's a perfectly fine pilot's watch that is extremely readable. In use, it's kinda a smooshed Flieger type B.

·

I always wondered wtf they were thinking but never cared enough to look it up. Thanks for doing the work 😬👌

·
Lufty_Luft

I will come to the current design's defence and say that it's a perfectly fine pilot's watch that is extremely readable. In use, it's kinda a smooshed Flieger type B.

Yes, I think you are right about Rolex is trying to make it more like a Flieger type B watch, especially with the 126900. In Rolex Magazine issue# 10, they wrote "The new Air-King is now even more closely aligned with the world of aviation that is its inspiration" and didn't mention the Bloodhound project at all.

·

I've been obsessed with the 126900 since I first saw it.

Image
Image
Image
Image