Is the 36.4mm Seiko SRPJ Midfielder too small for me?

Seems a bit on the tiny side for a 6.75"/17cm wrist? Should I instead get the 39mm SRPG version? Cheers!

·

No not too small, it looks great on you!

·

This is the way a wrist watch should look.

·
JoriKo

No not too small, it looks great on you!

Thank you! I'm a bit worried it's too small even though I just love the cream dial which the bigger model lacks.

Unsure if it's just the wrist size but I'm 1.95m/6'5" tall and the watch presence felt a bit too tiny on my wrist while looking in the mirror, lol

·

respectfully, i do think it's too small. you asked!

but then again, you do you, more power to you.

·
Image

No. It is watch sized.

·
foghorn

This is the way a wrist watch should look.

👆What he said

·

The whole idea that a watch should take up a certain amount of space, like reaching across most of the wrist with the lugs, is preference. I think that looks fine. If you want a larger version though, go for it.

My CWC diver I'm wearing right now isn't much different. The case is larger, but the dial and lug to lug relative to wrist are pretty similar.

Image
·

<Insert picture of Muhammad Ali wearing a Cartier Tank here>

·
ahavajava

respectfully, i do think it's too small. you asked!

but then again, you do you, more power to you.

I did legitimately ask! Not looking for compliments lol, just honesty

·
English_archer

<Insert picture of Muhammad Ali wearing a Cartier Tank here>

Haha ffs

·

I like my watches to wear larger because it is what I choose but I wore 36mm watches for a period in the 80s, didn’t feel comfortable with the case size and strap relationship. I do not believe there is a size for a watch to be, different things make people happy. Met a young man just yesterday who owns a Patek Calatrava from his dad, some watches from other family but is infatuated with his Tudor BB41 black bezel watch, has not removed the watch since he purchased it a few years ago.

·
Dallen

The whole idea that a watch should take up a certain amount of space, like reaching across most of the wrist with the lugs, is preference. I think that looks fine. If you want a larger version though, go for it.

My CWC diver I'm wearing right now isn't much different. The case is larger, but the dial and lug to lug relative to wrist are pretty similar.

Image

That huge body gives it a far stronger presence that this very lightly coloured Seiko. The fact that it's lighter in colour and more *office* looking does make it look a bit weird on my very hairy forearm, I feel like. But then again I wanted to see what other people think, as I might very well be imagining things

·
Aurelian
Image

No. It is watch sized.

I'm so sorry.

·

Looks great man. Perfect size

·
arkwatch

That huge body gives it a far stronger presence that this very lightly coloured Seiko. The fact that it's lighter in colour and more *office* looking does make it look a bit weird on my very hairy forearm, I feel like. But then again I wanted to see what other people think, as I might very well be imagining things

Fair enough. I think what creates presence is a little bit beyond me. I mostly just worry about if I like the look of the watch and if it's going to be too big for my liking. The bottom of the size range is pretty flexible to me.

·

Nope!

·

Nope.

6.5" and wear all the way down to 32.

36mm Lorier Falcon seems fine to me.

Image
·

@solidyetti That's insane to me. Not sure what the lug to lug is on the Lorier Falcon but it seems to cover your wrist pretty well. Compared to my picture where the watch itself barely covers the whole visible forearm width.

·

Looks smaller then my preference.