📣 New feature alert: Collections!!
Access via collections tab in your profile ✌️
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the authentic presence for this person or brand.
Both completely acceptable, imo. If someone is looking for accuracy that beats your ETA they should really just go digital.
I make similar observations comparing my 31xx movements with the 2892/2824 equipped watches that I have.
I make similar observations comparing my 31xx movements with the 2892/2824 equipped watches that I have.
If it’s not magnesium, Sinn’s ETA would have performed better than that.
Both completely acceptable, imo. If someone is looking for accuracy that beats your ETA they should really just go digital.
EDIT:
I miss read the time on the Rolex. My watches are not that accurate, but they beat the ETA.
I have a few watches that keeps better time than both of those. A Seiko 5 with a 7S26 running at COSC standards out of the box. A "Romer" with an FHF movement rebuilt by some Indian company. And a Ridge field watch with a Miyota 9039 that I had my LWM adjust for me.